{"id":274,"date":"2025-09-25T19:47:05","date_gmt":"2025-09-25T18:47:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/?p=274"},"modified":"2025-09-26T21:40:28","modified_gmt":"2025-09-26T20:40:28","slug":"6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/","title":{"rendered":"6) Analyzing data &#8211; formatively and summatively"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Analysis in DAS serves decisions, not vanity metrics. Formatively, while data is still coming in, you\u2019ll track a simple task-tag heatmap, watch emotion trends, and spot friction early. Summatively, you\u2019ll build four crisp views: volume by action, top tags, emotion distribution, and the heatmap. Then you\u2019ll read clusters of quotes (sorted by action, tag, or feeling), extracting 3-5 representative snippets that make patterns tangible. The synthesis culminates in shared design principles phrased as \u201cIn context X, do Y to achieve Z,\u201d. We provide a workshop format: silent reading \u2192 small groups \u2192 plenary alignment \u2192 silent closing reflection. This converts data into commitment. You\u2019ll learn light-touch validity moves: triangulate, replicate across teams, and look for convergence across sources. Finally, we cover feedback to contributors.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In DAS, analysis is not something postponed until the end. It is woven into the process from the very beginning of data collection. First through early sense-making while reflections are still arriving, then through systematic compilation that mixes numbers with words, and finally through collegial workshops where all participants are invited to explore the findings together. Thinking of analysis in these three steps makes it easier to see how lived experience can be turned into patterns, and how patterns can grow into shared insights that guide future practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Step 1: Formative analysis<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As reflections come in, study leaders do not wait passively for the dataset to be complete. Instead, they scan the stream of short reflections, emotion ratings and tag choices for early signals. This early reading carries an ethnographic feel. When study leaders immerse themselves in the participants\u2019 lived accounts, they gain a sense of the everyday textures, moods, and struggles that numbers alone cannot convey. These formative impressions are not definitive findings, but represent a kind of researcher\u2019s diary of observing emerging patterns, noticing surprising turns, and documenting tentative insights through comments to participants. Such sense-making helps prevent the \u201ccollect now, think later\u201d trap. It also keeps the inquiry alive, allowing adjustments to tasks or asking participants timely questions while the process is still unfolding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Step 2: Compiling and mixing<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>When a cycle of action ends, the dataset is compiled. Each reflection is already linked to a task, emotion rating, tags, and feedback, which makes preparation and export into a spreadsheet or QDA software straightforward. Analysis starts with a \u201csatellite view\u201d &#8211; descriptive statistics showing how many reflections each task generated, which tags dominated, and how emotions varied. To then grasp the \u201cstreet view\u201d, clusters of reflections are read to uncover the lived experiences behind the counts, often sorted by task, tag or emotion, or through multi-key sorting and filtering. A central tool is the task\u2013tag matrix, providing a heat map of where actions consistently triggered certain outcomes, such as confidence, frustration, or collaboration. Hot spots in this matrix guide attention to the most interesting reflections. Other visualisations such as spider diagrams, tag tables, emotion timelines and AI-generated text summaries can also highlight key patterns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The strength of this step lies in combining big-and-thick data (cf. Weltevrede, 2016, p.17). Enough volume for pattern detection in big data, enough depth for explanation in thick data. Since tasks act as independent variables and tags, reflections, and emotions as dependent ones, DAS is especially well suited for causal mechanism-hunting, that is, exploring how and why certain actions produce particular effects in education or workplace settings (cf Ylikoski, 2019).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Step 3: Collective sense-making<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another defining feature of DAS analysis is that it is not reserved for a single researcher. The study leader prepares summaries, often a slide deck, large A3 printouts or a two-page report, and then invites participants to a collective workshop. There, everyone engages with the material in stages. First individually, then in small groups, then together in plenary. This prevents premature closure and ensures multiple perspectives are voiced. The session ends with a final round of reflections, written during 15 minutes of silence, capturing fresh insights sparked by the discussion.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These collective elements are more than symbolism. They deepen trust, democratise interpretation, and ensure that findings are not imposed from above but co-created. A collegial dimension also helps realise the Humboldtian vision of teachers and students as partners in knowledge creation (cf Shumar and Robinson, 2018). Finally, collective sense-making makes participants see a bigger meaning in reflective practice. It helps them see how their own everyday actions connect to shared challenges, emerging patterns, and new opportunities for improvement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Examples of data analysis<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Examples of formative analysis include studies in social work by Tjulin and Klockmo (2023, p.105) and by Tjulin et al. (2024, p.6.), where they describe formative analysis as a \u201creciprocal iterative process\u201d, a \u201cback-and-forth dialogue\u201d between empirics and theory, performed \u201clongitudinally and simultaneously with data collection\u201d. Examples of tag based analysis include a study on AI-based conversational agents where tags were seen to represent participants\u2019 \u201cmost prominent experiences\u201d (Ericsson et al., 2024, p.759), as well as a study on coffee shop owners where tags were seen as a \u201cmeans of self-expression\u201d (Morland and Lever, 2024, p.9). Examples of task-tag matrices can be seen in the study by Viebke (2020) and in many of my own studies (Lack\u00e9us, 2020a, p.216; Lack\u00e9us and S\u00e4vetun, 2025, p.226; Lack\u00e9us, 2025, p.202). The use of AI for qualitative data analysis has just begun, but has strong potential as illustrated in a recent conference paper (Lack\u00e9us, 2025). Many of these analytic steps are supported by the research tool Loopme, where task-tag matrix, spider diagram and AI summaries have been built into the system. Loopme configurations are also shown visually in some articles (Bostr\u00f6m et al., 2025, p.272; Ericsson et al., 2024, p.758; Lack\u00e9us, 2020a, p.210).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Challenges in data analysis<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Analysing DAS data is rich but demanding (Lack\u00e9us, 2025). A first challenge is the time needed to compile and interpret hundreds of reflections, tags, and emotion ratings. This can overwhelm study leaders, especially those without research training. A second issue is the complexity of mixed data, requiring a delicate balance between descriptive statistics and lived experiences. Third,&nbsp; since DAS relies on self-reports, concerns about data quality have been raised. Insights may be superficially described, impacted by social desirability bias or hidden due to reluctance to share failures, raising questions about validity and reliability. Fourth, collective analysis brings both benefits and challenges. Workshops can democratize interpretation but also risk uneven contributions if not well structured. Finally there is the challenge of translating into practice. Practitioners struggle with transforming uncovered patterns into actionable improvements, and scholars struggle with how to publish insights generated with a novel methodology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>The end result of analysed DAS studies<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The outcomes of DAS analysis extend beyond reports. Studies yield revised design principles and mechanism-based explanations, clarifying how specific actions led to particular outcomes. Formative analysis supports real-time improvements, with tasks adapted during the data collection phase. Collective analysis turns individual accounts into shared insight, with a final round of reflections producing meta-reflections &#8211; fresh data sparked by the analytic dialogue itself. AI-generated summaries provide quick overviews for practitioners. Seeing their words visualised also brings validation and ownership. At a scholarly level, DAS studies contribute to theory-building and research methodology, enriching debates on causal mechanisms and clinical action research.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Analysis in DAS serves decisions, not vanity metrics. Formatively, while data is still coming in, you\u2019ll track a simple task-tag heatmap, watch emotion trends, and spot friction early. Summatively, you\u2019ll build four crisp views: volume by action, top tags, emotion distribution, and the heatmap. Then you\u2019ll read clusters of quotes (sorted by action, tag, or [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":275,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-274","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-method"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>6) Analyzing data - formatively and summatively - Everyday institute<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"6) Analyzing data - formatively and summatively - Everyday institute\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Analysis in DAS serves decisions, not vanity metrics. Formatively, while data is still coming in, you\u2019ll track a simple task-tag heatmap, watch emotion trends, and spot friction early. Summatively, you\u2019ll build four crisp views: volume by action, top tags, emotion distribution, and the heatmap. Then you\u2019ll read clusters of quotes (sorted by action, tag, or [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Everyday institute\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-25T18:47:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-26T20:40:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/derivata.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"764\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"434\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Martin Lack\u00e9us\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Martin Lack\u00e9us\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/method\\\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/method\\\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Martin Lack\u00e9us\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c5bed3d762e6089756b0408d04ee3349\"},\"headline\":\"6) Analyzing data &#8211; formatively and summatively\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-25T18:47:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-26T20:40:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/method\\\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1192,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/method\\\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/derivata.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Method\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/method\\\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/method\\\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/method\\\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\\\/\",\"name\":\"6) Analyzing data - formatively and summatively - Everyday institute\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/method\\\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/method\\\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/derivata.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-25T18:47:05+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-26T20:40:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c5bed3d762e6089756b0408d04ee3349\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/method\\\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/method\\\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/method\\\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/derivata.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/derivata.png\",\"width\":764,\"height\":434},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/method\\\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/home-2\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"6) Analyzing data &#8211; formatively and summatively\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"Everyday institute\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/c5bed3d762e6089756b0408d04ee3349\",\"name\":\"Martin Lack\u00e9us\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0f9dddbdde95bec2a8ada90a027b5bf8aa36eb164db99df392cff1c33311f45c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0f9dddbdde95bec2a8ada90a027b5bf8aa36eb164db99df392cff1c33311f45c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/0f9dddbdde95bec2a8ada90a027b5bf8aa36eb164db99df392cff1c33311f45c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Martin Lack\u00e9us\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.everydayinstitute.se\\\/en\\\/author\\\/martin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"6) Analyzing data - formatively and summatively - Everyday institute","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"6) Analyzing data - formatively and summatively - Everyday institute","og_description":"Analysis in DAS serves decisions, not vanity metrics. Formatively, while data is still coming in, you\u2019ll track a simple task-tag heatmap, watch emotion trends, and spot friction early. Summatively, you\u2019ll build four crisp views: volume by action, top tags, emotion distribution, and the heatmap. Then you\u2019ll read clusters of quotes (sorted by action, tag, or [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/","og_site_name":"Everyday institute","article_published_time":"2025-09-25T18:47:05+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-26T20:40:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":764,"height":434,"url":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/derivata.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Martin Lack\u00e9us","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Martin Lack\u00e9us","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/"},"author":{"name":"Martin Lack\u00e9us","@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c5bed3d762e6089756b0408d04ee3349"},"headline":"6) Analyzing data &#8211; formatively and summatively","datePublished":"2025-09-25T18:47:05+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-26T20:40:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/"},"wordCount":1192,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/derivata.png","articleSection":["Method"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/","url":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/","name":"6) Analyzing data - formatively and summatively - Everyday institute","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/derivata.png","datePublished":"2025-09-25T18:47:05+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-26T20:40:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c5bed3d762e6089756b0408d04ee3349"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/derivata.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/derivata.png","width":764,"height":434},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/method\/6-analyzing-data-formative-and-summative\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/home-2\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"6) Analyzing data &#8211; formatively and summatively"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/","name":"Everyday institute","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/c5bed3d762e6089756b0408d04ee3349","name":"Martin Lack\u00e9us","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0f9dddbdde95bec2a8ada90a027b5bf8aa36eb164db99df392cff1c33311f45c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0f9dddbdde95bec2a8ada90a027b5bf8aa36eb164db99df392cff1c33311f45c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/0f9dddbdde95bec2a8ada90a027b5bf8aa36eb164db99df392cff1c33311f45c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Martin Lack\u00e9us"},"url":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/author\/martin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=274"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":322,"href":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/274\/revisions\/322"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/275"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.everydayinstitute.se\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}