Who does what, and how do we keep it humane and repeatable? This chapter maps four core roles: the study lead team (design, comments, analysis, facilitation), the sponsoring leader (legitimacy and time), participants (doing, reflecting), and an optional analysis/ethics steward. We propose a simple yearly rhythm that dovetails with existing forums: team huddles, unit reviews, and leadership meetings. You’ll learn how to set transparency levels, manage access rights, and budget the only non-negotiable currency—attention. We detail onboarding micro-training, peer coaching in pairs, and a small library of content packages and examples to accelerate new study leads. You’ll also get practical operating habits: a comment SLA and tone guide, a shared version log, a standard analysis workshop, and a compact feedback report. The aim is lightweight governance: just enough structure to scale across teams without centralizing insight or stifling local initiative. We close with growth paths—how to cultivate new study leads, avoid burnout, and keep the culture oriented toward learning, not control. DAS thrives when roles are clear, burdens are fair, and contributions are visibly valued.